Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 332-338, May 2010

The effect of FES of the tibial nerve on physiological activation of leg muscles during gait

  • Colleen C. Monaghan

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Biomedical Technology (BMTI), University of Twente, Postbus 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Hermie J. Hermens

      Affiliations

    • Roessingh Research and Development B.V., P.O. Box 310, 7500 AH Enschede, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Anand V. Nene

      Affiliations

    • Roessingh Research and Development B.V., P.O. Box 310, 7500 AH Enschede, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Martin J.B. Tenniglo

      Affiliations

    • Roessingh Research and Development B.V., P.O. Box 310, 7500 AH Enschede, The Netherlands
    • Roessingh Rehabilitation Centre, Roessinghsbleekweg 33, Postbus 310, 7522 AH Enschede, 7500 AH, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Peter H. Veltink

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Biomedical Technology (BMTI), University of Twente, Postbus 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 53 489 2765.

Received 13 April 2009; received in revised form 12 November 2009; accepted 10 January 2010. published online 08 February 2010.

Abstract 

The effects of surface functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the tibial nerve of healthy subjects were evaluated. The FES was applied at three different times during gait: early, mid and late stances. The purpose of this work is to understand the effect of unilateral stimulation on the bilateral activation patterns of leg muscles, because FES is used in practice to improve gait, while associated neuromuscular change is not often measured. The experimental protocol presented here will be transferred to stroke subjects, who could benefit from improved push-off during gait. Results show that FES of the tibial nerve changes the offset timing of the tibialis anterior muscle on the stimulated side and the on- and offset timings of the tibialis anterior muscle of the leg contralateral to stimulation. Additionally, activity levels of the semitendinosus ipsilateral and tibialis anterior contralateral to the stimulated leg significantly decreased, with respect to the non-stimulated condition. For the semitendinosus, this was a difference of 6–7μV, with p<0.05. For the tibialis anterior, this was a difference of 7–15μV, with a significance of p=0.00, respectively.

This information is important for future applications of stimulation as it means that stimulation not only affects the stimulated muscle but also the physiological motor control by the CNS.

Keywords: Functional electrical stimulation, FES, Electromyography, EMG, Healthy subjects, Tibial nerve, Gastrocnemius, Soleus, Triceps surae, Calf muscle, Activation patterns, Push-off, Gait

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 European Commission: Research Training Network, NeuralPRO.

PII: S1350-4533(10)00005-6

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.01.003

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 332-338, May 2010