Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 31, Issue 8 , Pages 923-929, October 2009

Electroretinographic wet electrode

  • Federico Carpi

      Affiliations

    • Interdepartmental Research Center “E. Piaggio”, School of Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 050 2217064; fax: +39 050 2217050.
  • ,
  • Gabriella Benini

      Affiliations

    • Oculistic Clinic, Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy
  • ,
  • Franca Tomei

      Affiliations

    • Oculistic Clinic, Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy
  • ,
  • Rosa Maria Figliuzzi

      Affiliations

    • Interdepartmental Research Center “E. Piaggio”, School of Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • Alberto De Napoli

      Affiliations

    • Oculistic Clinic, Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy

Received 4 February 2009; received in revised form 24 April 2009; accepted 13 May 2009. published online 08 June 2009.

Abstract 

This paper presents the first systematic characterisation of a new electroretinographic (ERG) electrode, recently described. The new ‘wet’ electrode uses a conducting liquid as a distributed electrical interface between the eye and a solid electronic conductor; the latter detects the ERG potential without any direct contact with the ocular surface. This technique avoids the contact-induced discomfort of both corneal and conjunctival standard electrodes. The wet electrode was tested on 10 volunteers, in comparison with a conjunctival electrode (HK loop), as the most comfortable standard. It was also compared with a cutaneous (cup) electrode, which is even more comfortable, although not standard. Results showed the efficacy of the wet electrode for detecting morphologically accurate ERG responses, with amplitudes respectively analogous and higher of those measured by the conjunctival and cutaneous electrodes. Properties of wet electrodes include: no solid interface with the eye, no need for anaesthesia, intrinsic safety, mechanical and electrical stability against ocular movements, tolerance to misplacements and immunity to lacrimation. As a drawback, the liquid can still be a source of discomfort for some patients and it requires care against possible leakage. All these features suggest a possible use of wet electrodes as an additional tool for ERG procedures, although limited to tests of short duration.

Keywords: Electrode, Electroretinography, Electroretinogram, ERG, Fluid, Liquid, Ocular, Potential, Wet

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1350-4533(09)00114-3

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.05.003

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 31, Issue 8 , Pages 923-929, October 2009