Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 420-427 , May 2009

Deformation simulation of cells seeded on a collagen-GAG scaffold in a flow perfusion bioreactor using a sequential 3D CFD-elastostatics model

  • C. Jungreuthmayer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
    • Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
    • Siemens Medical Ireland, Leeson Close, Dublin 2, Ireland
  • ,
  • M.J. Jaasma

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
    • Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • ,
  • A.A. Al-Munajjed

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
    • Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • ,
  • J. Zanghellini

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Chemistry, Karl Franzens University Graz, Graz, Austria
  • ,
  • D.J. Kelly

      Affiliations

    • Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • ,
  • F.J. O’Brien

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
    • Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Anatomy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. Tel.: +353 1 402 2149; fax: +353 1 402 2355.

Received 14 December 2007 ,Revised 30 April 2008 ,Accepted 11 November 2008.

References 

  1. American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons Report 2002.
  2. Rose FRAJ, Oreffo ROC. Bone tissue engineering: hope vs hype. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;292:1–7
  3. Wintermantel E, Ha S-W. Medizintechnik mit biokompatiblen Werkstoffen und Verfahren, Springer Verlag. ISBN: 978-3540412618; 2002.
  4. Mikos AG, Temenoff JS. Formation of highly porous biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering. EJB Electron J Biotechnol. 2000;3(2):1–6
  5. Yannas IV, Lee E, Orgill DP, Skrabut EM, Murphy GF. Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:933–937
  6. O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson L. Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1077–1086
  7. Farrell E, O’Brien FJ, Doyle P, Fischer J, Yannas IV, Harley BA, et al. A collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold supports adult rat mesenchymal stem cell differentiation along osteogenic and chondrogenic routes. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(3):459–468
  8. Compton CC, Butler CE, Yannas IV, Warland G, Orgill Dennis P. Organized skin structure is regenerated in vivo from collagen-GAG matrices seeded with autologous keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;110(6):908–916
  9. Bancroft GN, Sikavitsas VI, van den Dolder J, Sheffield TL, Ambrose CG, Jansen JA, et al. Fluid flow increases mineralized matrix deposition in 3D perfusion culture of marrow stromal osteoblasts in a dose-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(20):12600–12605
  10. Cartmell SH, Porter BD, Garcia AJ, Guldberg RE. Effects of media perfusion rate on cell seeded 3D bone constructs in vitro. Tissue Eng. 2003;9(6):1197–1203
  11. Jaasma MJ, Plunkett NA, O’Brien FJ. Design and validation of a dynamic flow perfusion bioreactor for use with compliant tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biotechnol. 2008;133(4):490–496
  12. Claes LE, Heigele CA. Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech. 1999;32:255–266
  13. Carter DR, Beaupré GS, Giori NJ, Helms JA. Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Related Res. 1988;355S:S41–S55
  14. Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Søballe K. Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech. 1997;30(6):539–548
  15. McGarry JG, Klein-Nulend J, Mullender MG, Prendergast PJ. A comparison of strain and fluid shear stress in stimulating bone cell responses—a computational and experimental study. FASEB J. 2005;19(3):482–484
  16. Wang Y, McNamara LM, Schaffler MB, Weinbaum S. A model for the role of integrins in flow induced mechanotranduction in osteocytes. PNAS. 2007;104(40):15941
  17. Weinbaum S, Cowin SC, Zeng Y. A model for the excitation of osteocytes by mechanical loading-induced bone fluid shear stresses. J Biomech. 1994;27:339
  18. Smalt R, Mitchell FT, Howard RL, Chambers TJ. Induction of NO and prostaglandin E2 in osteoblasts by wall-shear stress but not mechanical strain. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 1997;273(4):E751–E758
  19. Vance J, Galley D, Liu DF, Donahue SW. Mechanical stimulation of MC3T3 osteoblastic cells in a bone tissue-engineering bioreactor enhances prostaglandin E2 release. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:1832–1839
  20. Jaasma MJ, O’Brien FJ. Mechanical stimulation of osteoblasts using steady and dynamic fluid flow. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(7):1213–1223
  21. Gupta T, Donahue TLH. Role of cell location and morphology in the mechanical environment around meniscal cells. Acta Biomaterialia. 2006;2(5):483–492
  22. Porter B, Zauel R, Stockman H, Guldberg R, Fyhrie D. 3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. J Biomech. 2005;38(3):543–549
  23. Cioffi M, Boschetti F, Raimondi MT, Dubini G. Modeling evaluation of the fluid-dynamic microenvironment in tissue-engineered constructs: a micro-CT based model. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;93(3):500–510
  24. Sandino C, Planell JA, Lacroix D. A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomech. 2008;41:1005–1014
  25. McMahon L. The effect of cyclic tensile loading and growth factors on the chondrogenic differentiation of bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells in a collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold, PhD thesis, Trinity College Dublin, 2007.
  26. O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson L. The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26(4):433–441
  27. Freyman TM, Yannas IV, Pek Y-S, Yokoo R, Gibson LJ. Micromechanics of fibroblast contraction of a collagen-GAG matrix. Exp Cell Res. 2001;269:140
  28. Manimaran M, Tay FEH, Chaw KC. Cell deformation in cancer metastasis: a BioMEMS based approach. J Phys: Conference Ser. 2006;34:1143–1147
  29. Haugh MG, Jaasma MJ, O’Brien FJ. The effect of dehydrothermal treatment on the mechanical and structural properties of collagen-GAG scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008. [Epub ahead of print].
  30. Harley BA, Leung JH, Silva ECCM, Gibson LJ. Mechanical characterization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Acta biomaterialia. 2007;3(4):463–474
  31. http://www.opencfd.co.uk/openfoam/
  32. Karcher H, Lammerding J, Huang H, Lee RT, Kamm RD, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR. A three-dimensional viscoelastic model for cell deformation with experimental verification. Biophys J. 2003;85:3336–3349
  33. Theret DP, Levesque MJ, Sato F, Nerem RM, Wheeler LT. The application of a homogenous half-space model in the analysis of endothelial cell micropipette measurements. J Biomech Eng. 1998;110(3):190–199
  34. Batra N, Li Y, Yellowley C, You L, Malone A, Kim C, et al. Effects of short-term recovery periods on fluid-induced signaling in osteoblastic cells. J Biomech. 2005;38:1909–1917
  35. Meyer U, Kruse-Lösler B, Wiesmann HP. Principles of bone formation driven by biophysical forces in craniofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2006;44:289–295

PII: S1350-4533(08)00205-1

doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.003

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 420-427 , May 2009