Elsevier

Medical Engineering & Physics

Volume 30, Issue 10, December 2008, Pages 1209-1226
Medical Engineering & Physics

Fracture of bone tissue: The ‘hows’ and the ‘whys’

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.007Get rights and content

Abstract

The mechanical performance of bone is of paramount importance for the quality of life we experience. The structural integrity of bone, its hierarchical structure, organisation and its physicochemical constitution, all influence its ability to withstand loads, such as those seen occasionally in everyday life loading scenarios, which are either above the norm, prolonged, or repetitive. The present review explores three interconnected areas of research where significant progress has been made lately: (i) The recorded mechanical behaviour of bone and the way it fails; (ii) the inner architecture, organisational, hierarchical structure of bone tissue; and (iii) the bone properties at the micro/nanostructural and biophysical level. Exercising a line of thought along a structure/function based argument we advance from ‘how’ bone fractures to ‘why’ it fractures, and we seek to obtain a fresh insight in this field.

Introduction

The mechanical performance of bone is of paramount importance for the quality of life we experience, as fractures are painful debilitating events. Some fractures are quite obviously due to the fact that bone is subject to loads that exceed certain threshold levels (in terms of stress or damage), that may also be prolonged (creep), or repetitive (fatigue). Others are caused by bone being structurally compromised as a result of disease, ageing, surgical intervention, pharmaceutical treatments, poor diet, lack of exercise, and so forth. In all cases some sense can be made by invoking either material/ engineering principles to explain the effects of overload, or structure/function relationships [1] to grapple with the effects of a materially and structurally compromised tissue.

Section snippets

How bone breaks

There is a consensus regarding the various stages leading to and during fracture of bone, but what is still debated is the relative importance of the various phases in determining the final failure outcome [2]. The stress/strain curve (in tension) for bone as a material shows a (macroscopically) linear phase followed by a ‘knee’ region where the material yields and then a region of strain hardening (which can be shorter or longer depending on the circumstances) followed by sudden catastrophic

Hierarchical structure and composite mechanics

In order to understand the origins of the high toughness and stiffness of bone, and the reasons for its alterations with age and disease, we have to consider the full complexity of the hierarchical architecture [1], [27] from the macro- to the micro-scale and the mechanical properties of the various constituents at each level. The heterogeneity of bone at the meso- and microscale has a direct influence on growth of cracks within bone and on the failure process (Fig. 6).

Bone nanostructure: collagen fibres, fibril arrays, crystals

The most prominent nanostructures are the collagen fibres, surrounded and infiltrated by mineral. The attachment sites of macromolecules onto the collagen framework are not distinctly known, although several immunohistological studies have shown preferential labelling of some macromolecules in a periodic fashion along the collagen molecules and fibres [86].

The three main building materials are crystals, collagen, and non-collagenous organic proteins. Mature crystals are most likely not

Conclusions

To develop a clear picture of the structure/function relationships in bone, research follows two paths: (i) conventional material characterization of its performance and (ii) structural analysis of the mechanisms underlying bone fracture. For the latter, we can identify two main current challenges, one at the bone material level and one at the microstructural level. At the material level, one critical limitation now appears to be the difficulty in developing an accurate quantitative picture of

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Acknowledgments

P. Zioupos is grateful to various colleagues: R. Cook, K. Winwood, V. Wise, J.D. Currey, U. Hansen, A.J. Sedman, and also to J.-Y. Rho whose untimely death was a great loss. H.S. Gupta would like to thank the Max Planck Society and the German-Israeli Foundation (Project no. I-800-180.10\2003) for support, and numerous coworkers, in particular: P. Fratzl, W. Wagermaier, S. Krauß, J. Seto, K. Kanawka, M. Kerschnitzki, G. Benecke, U. Stachewicz, and P. Roschger.

References (140)

  • J.D. Currey

    Tensile yield in compact bone is determined by strain, post-yield behaviour by mineral content

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (2004)
  • P. Zioupos et al.

    An examination of the micromechanics of failure of bone and antler by acoustic-emission tests and laser-scanning-confocal-microscopy

    Medical Engineering & Physics

    (1994)
  • P. Zioupos et al.

    Experimental and theoretical quantification of the development of damage in fatigue tests of bone and antler

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1996)
  • L.J. Gibson

    The mechanical behavior of cancellous bone

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1985)
  • P. Zioupos et al.

    Some basic relationships between density values in cancellous and cortical bone

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (2008)
  • K. Choi et al.

    The elastic-moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1990)
  • J.C. Rice et al.

    On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1988)
  • R.B. Ashman et al.

    Elastic-modulus of trabecular bone material

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1988)
  • C.H. Turner et al.

    The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1999)
  • A.B. Christensen et al.

    Assessment of tibial stiffness by vibration testing in-situ-1: identification of mode shapes in different supporting conditions

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1986)
  • J.Y. Rho et al.

    Relations of mechanical-properties to density and CT numbers in human bone

    Medical Engineering & Physics

    (1995)
  • S. Goldstein

    The mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Dependence on anatomic location and function

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1987)
  • B. VanRietbergen et al.

    Direct mechanics assessment of elastic symmetries and properties of trabecular bone architecture

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1996)
  • A. Odgaard et al.

    Fabric and elastic principal directions of cancellous bone are closely related

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1997)
  • F. Linde et al.

    The effect of constraint on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1989)
  • A. Odgaard et al.

    The underestimation of Young modulus in compressive testing of cancellous bone specimens

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1991)
  • A. Ascenzi et al.

    The bending properties of single osteons

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1990)
  • A. Ascenzi et al.

    The torsional properties of single selected osteons

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1994)
  • C. Mercer et al.

    Mechanisms governing the inelastic deformation of cortical bone and application to trabecular bone

    Acta Biomaterials

    (2006)
  • S. Weiner et al.

    Lamellar bone. Structure-function relations

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (1999)
  • S. Weiner et al.

    Rotated plywood structure of primary lamellar bone in the rat: orientations of the collagen fibril arrays

    Bone

    (1997)
  • R.M. Pidaparti et al.

    Bone mineral lies mainly outside of collagen fibrils. Predictions of a composite model for osteonal bone

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1996)
  • J.Y. Rho et al.

    Variations in the individual lamellar properties within osteons by nanoindentation

    Bone

    (1999)
  • J.Y. Rho et al.

    Youngs modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material-ultrasonic and microtensile measurements

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1993)
  • D.T. Reilly et al.

    Elastic-modulus for bone

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1974)
  • P.R. Townsend et al.

    Buckling studies of single human trabeculae

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1975)
  • W.J. Landis

    The strength of a calcified tissue depends in part on the molecular structure and organization of its constituent mineral crystals in their organic matrix

    Bone

    (1995)
  • L.C. Bonar et al.

    Neutron-diffraction studies of collagen in fully mineralized bone

    Journal of Molecular Biology

    (1985)
  • S. Lees

    Mineralization of type-I collagen

    Biophysical Journal

    (2003)
  • W.J. Landis et al.

    Mineralization of collagen may occur on fibril surfaces. Evidence from conventional and high-voltage electron microscopy and three-dimensional imaging

    Journal of Structural Biology

    (1996)
  • M.A. Rubin et al.

    TEM analysis of the nanostructure of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone

    Bone

    (2003)
  • K. Piekarski

    Fractography of bone

  • H. Peterlik et al.

    From brittle to ductile fracture of bone

    Nature Materials

    (2006)
  • R.Z. Wang et al.

    Observations of damage morphologies in nacre during deformation and fracture

    Journal of Materials Science

    (1995)
  • J.W. Melvin

    Fracture mechanics of bone

    Journal of Biomechanical Engineering—Transactions of the ASME

    (1993)
  • K.J. Koester et al.

    The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks

    Nature Materials

    (2008)
  • D. Vashishth et al.

    Toughening mechanisms in cortical bone

    42nd Annual Meeting ORS, February 19–22

    In:

    (1996)
  • R.O. Ritchie et al.

    A fracture mechanics and mechanistic approach to the failure of cortical bone

    Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures

    (2005)
  • R.K. Nalla et al.

    Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone

    Nature Materials

    (2003)
  • U. Hansen et al.

    The effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone

    Journal of Biomechanical Engineering—Transactions of the ASME

    (2008)
  • Cited by (106)

    • Failure of trabecular bone: XFEM modelling of multiple crack growth

      2024, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
    • Low-rank approximation of local strain in two-phase composites

      2024, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
    • Quantifying microcracks on fractured bone surfaces – Potential use in forensic anthropology

      2023, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Current address: School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS.

    View full text