Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 287-294 , April 2009

Parametric study on the interface pullout strength of the vertebral body replacement cage using FEM-based Taguchi methods

  • Wen-Hsien Hsu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan, ROC
  • ,
  • Ching-Kong Chao

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan, ROC
  • ,
  • Hsi-Ching Hsu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan, ROC
  • ,
  • Jinn Lin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan, ROC
  • ,
  • Ching-Chi Hsu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan, ROC
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43, Section 4, Keelung Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan, ROC. Tel.: +886 2 27333141x7597; fax: +886 2 27376460.

Received 3 December 2007 ,Revised 27 June 2008 ,Accepted 1 July 2008.

References 

  1. Knop C, Lange U, Bastian L, Oeser M, Blauth M. Biomechanical compression tests with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:30–37
  2. Pflugmacher R, Schleicher P, Schaefer J, Scholz M, Ludwig K, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, et al. Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine. 2004;29:1413–1419
  3. Vahldiek MJ, Panjabi MM. Stability potential of spinal instrumentations in tumor vertebral body replacement surgery. Spine. 1998;23:543–550
  4. Dvorak MF, Kwon BK, Fisher CG, Eiserloh HL, Boyd M, Wing PC. Effectiveness of titanium mesh cylindrical cages in anterior column reconstruction after thoracic and lumbar vertebral body resection. Spine. 2003;28(9):902–908
  5. Fayazi AH, Ludwig SC, Dabbah M, Butler RB, Gelb DE. Preliminary results of staged anterior debridement and reconstruction using titanium mesh cages in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine J. 2004;4:388–396
  6. Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG. The effects of bone density and disc degeneration on the structural property distributions in the lower lumbar vertebral endplates. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:1115–1120
  7. Jost B, Cripton PA, Lund T, Oxland TR, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, et al. Compressive strength of interbody cages in the lumbar spine: the effect of cage shape, posterior instrumentation and bone density. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):132–141
  8. Lim TH, Kwon H, Jeon CH, Kim JG, Sokolowski M, Natarajan R, et al. Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft–endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion. Spine. 2001;26(8):951–956
  9. Steffen T, Tsantrizos A, Aebi M. Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs. Spine. 2000;25(9):1077–1084
  10. Dietl RHJ, Krammer M, Kettler A, Wilke HJ, Claes L, Lumenta CB. Pullout test with three lumbar interbody fusion cages. Spine. 2002;27(10):1029–1036
  11. Grob D, Daehn S, Mannion AF. Titanium mesh cages (TMC) in spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2005;14(3):211–221
  12. Thongtyrangan I, Balabhadra R, Le H, Park J, Kim DH. Vertebral body replacement with and expandable cage for reconstruction after spinal tumor resection. Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15(5):1–6
  13. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G. Effects of fusion-bone stiffness on the mechanical behavior of the lumbar spine after vertebral body replacement. Clin Biomech. 2006;21:221–227
  14. Chao CK, Hsu CC, Wang JL, Lin J. Increasing bending strength of tibial locking screws: mechanical tests and finite element analyses. Clin Biomech. 2007;22:59–66
  15. Dar FH, Aspden RM. A finite element model of an idealized diarthrodial joint to investigate the effects of variation in the mechanical properties of the tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng H: J Eng Med. 2003;217(5):341–348
  16. Hou SM, Hsu CC, Wang JL, Chao CK, Lin J. Mechanical tests and finite element models for bone holding power of tibial locking screws. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:738–745
  17. Hsu CC, Chao CK, Wang JL, Lin J. Multiobjective optimization of tibial locking screws design using a genetic algorithm: evaluation of mechanical performance. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(5):908–916
  18. Lin CL, Chang SH, Chang WJ, Kuo YC. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method. Eur J Oral Sci. 2007;115(5):408–416
  19. Mburu G, Aspden RM, Hutchison JD. Optimising the configuration of cement keyholes for acetabular fixation in total hip replacement using Taguchi experimental design. Proc Inst Mech Eng H: J Eng Med. 1999;213:485–492
  20. Singer G, Ebramzadeh E, Jones NF, Meals R. Use of the Taguchi method for biomechanical comparison of flexor-tendon-repair techniques to allow immediate active flexion. A new method of analysis and optimization of technique to improve the quality of the repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(10):1498–1506
  21. Yao J, Funkenbusch PD, Snibbe J, Maloney M, Lerner AL. Sensitivities of medial meniscal motion and deformation to material properties of articular cartilage, meniscus and meniscal attachments using design of experiments methods. J Biomech Eng. 2006;128(3):399–408
  22. Dar FH, Meakin JR, Aspden RM. Statistical methods in finite element analysis. J Biomech. 2002;35:1155–1161
  23. Fowlkes WY, Creveling CM. Engineering methods for robust production design using Taguchi method in technology and product development. Reading: Addison Wesley; 1995;
  24. Knöller SM, Meyer G, Eckhardt C, Lill CA, Schneider E, Linke B. Range of motion in reconstruction situations following corpectomy in the lumbar spine: a question of bone mineral density?. Spine. 2005;30(9):E229–E235

PII: S1350-4533(08)00114-8

doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.07.001

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 287-294 , April 2009