Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 30, Issue 6 , Pages 747-754, July 2008

A treadmill control protocol combining nonlinear, equally smooth increases in speed and gradient: Exercise testing for subjects with gait and exercise limitations

  • L.P. Jamieson

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • K.J. Hunt

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
    • Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • D.B. Allan

      Affiliations

    • Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, United Kingdom

Received 30 March 2007; received in revised form 1 August 2007; accepted 10 August 2007. published online 04 October 2007.

Abstract 

Incremental exercise testing with a linear increase in work rate is the recommended method for clinical exercise testing. A recent protocol (A), incorporating a linear increase in speed and a nonlinear increase in gradient, has been developed which addresses some limitations of traditional testing methods. It does not account for those with an impaired gait pattern. We propose and assess a novel protocol (B) incorporating nonlinear increases in both speed and gradient.

We theoretically develop a new treadmill control protocol (B), determine oxygen uptake response linearity, initial metabolic rate and cardiopulmonary response parameters (peak oxygen uptake, lactate threshold, dynamic O2 cost) and compare the outcome measures with two previously verified IET protocols (A and C (constant speed with linear increase in gradient)). Feasibility and outcomes were explored with a subject with incomplete spinal cord injury.

The average initial metabolic rate () was substantially lower during protocol A (0.49 () lmin−1) and protocol B (0.52 () lmin−1) than during protocol C (1.35 () lmin−1). The average linearity of the response during protocols A and B (correlation co-efficients 0.97 () and 0.95 (), and co-efficients of determination 0.94 () and 0.91 (), respectively) were higher than during protocol C (correlation co-efficient 0.91 () and co-efficient of determination 0.84 ()). The average dynamic O2 cost for protocol C (6.53 () mlmin−1W−1) was lower than that of protocol A (10.02 () mlmin−1W−1) and protocol B (10.03 () mlmin−1W−1). No differences were found in these parameters between protocols A and B.

The new protocol B performs better than protocol C and is comparable with protocol A. When testing subjects with an impaired gait pattern, it may be advantageous to use the new protocol B due to the gradual increases in both speed and gradient throughout the test.

Keywords: Exercise physiology, Treadmill exercise, Incremental exercise testing, Gait impairment, Spinal cord injury

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1350-4533(07)00155-5

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.08.003

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 30, Issue 6 , Pages 747-754, July 2008