Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 434-443, May 2008

A computational framework to predict post-treatment outcome for gait-related disorders

  • Jeffrey A. Reinbolt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
  • ,
  • Raphael T. Haftka

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
  • ,
  • Terese L. Chmielewski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
  • ,
  • Benjamin J. Fregly

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
    • Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, 231 MAE-A Building, P.O. Box 116250, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-6250, United states. Tel.: +1 352 392 8157; fax: +1 352 392 7303.

Received 5 May 2006; received in revised form 9 May 2007; accepted 9 May 2007. published online 09 July 2007.

Abstract 

Clinicians often use intuitive models based on clinical experience or regression models based on population studies to plan treatment of gait-related disorders. Because such models are constructed using data collected from previous patients, the predicted clinical outcome for a particular patient may not be reliable. We propose a new approach that uses computational models based on engineering mechanics to predict post-treatment outcome from pre-treatment movement data. The approach utilizes a four-phase optimization process built around a dynamic, patient-specific gait model. The first three phases calibrate the model's joint, inertial, and control parameters, respectively, where the control parameters are weights in an optimization cost function that tracks the patient's pre-treatment gait motion and loads. The last phase predicts the patient's post-treatment gait pattern by performing a tracking optimization with the calibrated model modified to simulate the selected treatment.

We demonstrate the approach by simulating how two treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA) – gait modification and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) surgery – alter the external knee adduction torque for a specific patient. By performing multiple tracking optimizations, we calibrated the model's parameter values to reproduce the patient's knee adduction torque curve for a toe out gait motion. When we performed a tracking optimization with the calibrated model using a modified footpath to simulate an increased stance width, the predicted reduction in both adduction torque peaks matched experimental results to within 4.8% error. When we performed a tracking optimization with the same model using modified leg geometry to simulate HTO surgery, the predicted reductions were consistent with published data. The approach requires further evaluation with a larger number of patients to determine its effectiveness for planning the treatment of gait-related disorders on a patient-specific basis.

Keywords: Patient-specific, Optimization, Gait, Knee adduction moment, High tibial osteotomy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1350-4533(07)00092-6

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.05.005

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 434-443, May 2008