Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 30, Issue 3 , Pages 321-328 , April 2008

Prediction of mechanical properties of cortical bone by quantitative computed tomography

  • L. Duchemin

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Biomécanique, ENSAM CNRS UMR 8005, 151 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding authors. Tel.: +33 1 44246364; fax: +33 1 44246366.
  • ,
  • V. Bousson

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Radiologie Expérimentale, CNRS UMR 7052, Paris, France
    • Service de Radiologie Ostéo-Articulaire, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
  • ,
  • C. Raossanaly

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Biomécanique, ENSAM CNRS UMR 8005, 151 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
  • ,
  • C. Bergot

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Radiologie Expérimentale, CNRS UMR 7052, Paris, France
  • ,
  • J.D. Laredo

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Radiologie Expérimentale, CNRS UMR 7052, Paris, France
    • Service de Radiologie Ostéo-Articulaire, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
  • ,
  • W. Skalli

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Biomécanique, ENSAM CNRS UMR 8005, 151 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
  • ,
  • D. Mitton

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire de Biomécanique, ENSAM CNRS UMR 8005, 151 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding authors. Tel.: +33 1 44246364; fax: +33 1 44246366.

Received 17 May 2006 ,Revised 15 April 2007 ,Accepted 19 April 2007.

References 

  1. Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL. Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis?. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:1005–1010
  2. Dreux C, Delmas P. Les méthodes de mesure de la densité minérale osseuse (DMO) et des marqueurs du remodelage osseux dans le dépistage de l’ostéoporose. Bull Acad Nat Med. 2001;185:S169
  3. Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Skinner HB. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech. 1998;31:125–133
  4. Ferretti JL, Frost HM, Gasser JA, High WB, Jee WS, Jerome C, et al. Perspectives on osteoporosis research: its focus and some insights from a new paradigm. Calcif Tissue Int. 1995;57:399–404
  5. Mazess RB. Fracture risk: a role for compact bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 1990;47:191–193
  6. Hobatho MC, Rho JY, Ashman RB. In:  Van der Perre G,  Lowet G,  Borgwardt A editor. In vivo assessment of bone quality by vibration and wave propagation techniques. Part II. Leuven: ACCO; 1991;p. 7–38
  7. Keller TS. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. J Biomech. 1994;27:1159–1168
  8. Keller TS, Mao Z, Spengler DM. Young's modulus, bending strength, and tissue physical properties of human compact bone. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:592–603
  9. Lotz JC, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC. Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. J Biomech. 1991;24:317–329
  10. Kaneko TS, Pejcic MR, Tehranzadeh J, Keyak JH. Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25:445–454
  11. Cuppone M, Seedhom BB, Berry E, Ostell AE. The longitudinal Young's modulus of cortical bone in the midshaft of human femur and its correlation with CT scanning data. Calcif Tissue Int. 2004;74:302–309
  12. Rho JY, Hobatho MC, Ashman RB. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys. 1995;17:347–355
  13. Snyder SM, Schneider E. Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:422–431
  14. Wachter NJ, Augat P, Krischak GD, Sarkar MR, Mentzel M, Kinzl L, et al. Prediction of strength of cortical bone in vitro by microcomputed tomography. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16:252–256
  15. Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech. 1975;8:393–405
  16. Reilly DT, Burstein AH, Frankel VH. The elastic modulus for bone. J Biomech. 1974;7:271–275
  17. Burstein AH, Reilly DT, Martens M. Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:82–86
  18. Ashman RB, Cowin SC, Van Buskirk WC, Rice JC. A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech. 1984;17:349–361
  19. Augat P, Link T, Lang TF, Lin JC, Majumdar S, Genant HK. Anisotropy of the elastic modulus of trabecular bone specimens from different anatomical locations. Med Eng Phys. 1998;20:124–131
  20. Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA, Kuhn JL, Cody DD, Brown MB. Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:674–682
  21. Hvid I, Bentzen SM, Linde F, Mosekilde L, Pongsoipetch B. X-ray quantitative computed tomography: the relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech. 1989;22:837–844
  22. Lotz JC, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990;14:107–114

PII: S1350-4533(07)00081-1

doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.04.008

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 30, Issue 3 , Pages 321-328 , April 2008