Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 182-189, March 2008

Fluid pressure driven fibril reinforcement in creep and relaxation tests of articular cartilage

  • L.P. Li

      Affiliations

    • Roger Jackson Centre for Health and Wellness Research, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, N.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 403 220 3449.
  • ,
  • R.K. Korhonen

      Affiliations

    • Roger Jackson Centre for Health and Wellness Research, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, N.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
  • ,
  • J. Iivarinen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • J.S. Jurvelin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland
    • Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • W. Herzog

      Affiliations

    • Roger Jackson Centre for Health and Wellness Research, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, N.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4

Received 18 September 2006; received in revised form 27 February 2007; accepted 2 March 2007. published online 26 May 2007.

Abstract 

Biological tissues exhibit diverse mechanical behaviors because of complex material properties. As has been shown for ligaments and intervertebral discs, mathematical models often appear to well predict load responses individually by adjusting model parameters, but likely fail to describe several different load responses simultaneously using the same model parameters. In the present study, we attempted to describe and explain both creep and relaxation responses of articular cartilage using a fibril-reinforced model, which has been successfully used to account for the load response of the relaxation tests of articular cartilage. Experiments were performed on bovine articular cartilage disks (n=8) using multi-step loading protocols, involving both creep and relaxation in each protocol. The experimental results indicated that mechanical changes, such as fiber recruitment in collagen network during stretch, recovered fully upon unloading. Creep loading did not affect relaxation properties, and vice versa. Relaxation proceeded much faster than creep, because of different fluid pressure profiles. The load sharing among the proteoglycan matrix, collagen network and fluid pressurization was predicted to differ for the creep and relaxation testing. The experimentally observed strong creep and relaxation responses in unconfined compression could not be predicted if either fibril reinforcement or fluid pressurization were neglected. It was essential to consider the interplay between nonlinear fibril reinforcement and fluid pressurization for the transient response (this interplay may be best termed as fluid pressure driven fibril reinforcement). Fibril reinforcement played a relatively insignificant role in the compressive load response at equilibrium, in agreement with previous findings for cartilage stress relaxation testing.

Keywords: Articular cartilage mechanics, Bovine knee cartilage, Creep test, Fibril-reinforced model, Nonlinear material properties, Stress relaxation, Unconfined compression

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1350-4533(07)00042-2

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.03.001

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 182-189, March 2008