Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 213-217, March 2008

Comparative study between DD-HMM and RBF in ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation recognition

IPCT-PUCRS, Prédio 30, Sala 301-03, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619-900, Brazil

Received 16 August 2006; received in revised form 7 February 2007; accepted 9 February 2007. published online 31 March 2007.

Abstract 

This paper deals with automatic recognition of cardiac arrhythmias that require immediate electrical defibrillation therapy (ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia), through ECG (electrocardiogram) samples. The DD-HMM (discrete density hidden Markov model) and RBF (radial basis function) neural network algorithms were compared in the following aspects: precision, defined as correct recognition percentage and process time, defined as the delay since the ECG input until the result, indicating shock or non-shock events. The results show that RBF is more precise than DD-HMM but not so fast to evaluate. PhysioNet database files were used to train and to validate the algorithms.

Keywords: ECG, DD-HMM, Neural network, RBF, Ventricular tachycardia, Ventricular fibrillation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1350-4533(07)00038-0

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.02.006

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 213-217, March 2008