Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 29, Issue 3 , Pages 316-325 , April 2007

Mechanical analysis of percutaneous sacroplasty using CT image based finite element models

  • Dennis E. Anderson
  • ,
  • John R. Cotton

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Norris Hall, Mail Code 0219, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United Sates. Tel.: +1 540 231 7979; fax: +1 540 231 4574.

Received 12 September 2005 ,Revised 14 March 2006 ,Accepted 22 March 2006.

References 

  1. Lourie H. Spontaneous Osteoporotic Fracture of the Sacrum. JAMA. 1982;248:715–717
  2. Weber M, Hasler P, Gerber H. Insufficiency fractures of the sacrum, twenty cases and review of the literature. SPINE. 1993;18(16):2507–2512
  3. Grasland A, Pouchot J, Mathieu A, Paycha F, Vinceneux P. Sacral insufficiency fractures: an easily overlooked cause of back pain in elderly women. Arch. Intern. Med. 1996;156(6):668–674
  4. Babayev M, Lachmann E, Nagler W. The controversy surrounding sacral insufficiency fractures: to ambulate or not to ambulate?. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2000;79(4):404–409
  5. Newhouse KE, el-Khoury GY, Buckwalter JA. Occult sacral fractures in osteopenic patients. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1992;74:1472–1477
  6. Garant M. Sacroplasty: a new treatment for sacral insufficiency fracture. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2002;13:1265–1267
  7. Pommersheim W, Huang-Hellinger F, Baker M, Morris P. Sacroplasty: a treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003;24(5):1003–1007
  8. Dehdashti AR, Martin JB, Jean B, Rufenacht DA. PMMA cementoplasty in symptomatic metastatic lesions of the S1 vertebral body. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2000;23(3):235–237
  9. Marcy PY, Palussiere J, Descamps B, Magne N, Bondiau PY, Ciais C, et al. Percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic bone metastasis. Support Care Cancer. 2000;8(6):500–503
  10. Mathis JM, Barr JD, Belkoff SM, Barr MS, Jensen ME, Deramond H. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2001;22:373–381
  11. Watts NB, Harris ST, Genant HK. Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporos. Int. 2001;12:429–437
  12. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, et al. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty—the effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. SPINE. 2001;26(14):1537–1541
  13. Wilcox RK. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty: a review. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H]. 2004;218(1):1–10
  14. Dawson JM, Khmelniker BV, McAndrew MP. Analysis of the structural behavior of the pelvis during lateral impact using the finite element method. Accid. Anal. Prev. 1999;31(1–2):109–119
  15. Garcia JM, Doblare M, Seral B, Seral F, Palanca D, Gracia L. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of several internal and external pelvis fixations. J. Biomech. Eng. 2000;122(5):516–522
  16. Liebschner MAK, Rosenberg WS, Keaveny TM. Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty. SPINE. 2001;26(14):1547–1554
  17. Tack GR, Lee SY, Lee SJ, et al. Prediction of cement volume for vertebroplasty based on imaging and biomechanical results. KSME Int. J. 2001;15(7):1041–1050
  18. Polikeit A, Nolte LP, Ferguson SJ. The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite-element analysis. Spine. 2003;28(10):991–996
  19. Baroud G, Nemes J, Heini P, Steffen T. Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study. Eur. Spine J. 2003;12:421–426
  20. Baroud G, Wu JZ, Bohner M, Sponagel S, Steffen T. How to determine the permeability for cement infiltration of osteoporotic cancellous bone. Med. Eng. Phys. 2003;25:283–288
  21. Kosmopoulos V, Keller TS. Damage-based finite-element vertebroplasty simulations. Eur. Spine J. 2004;13(7):617–625
  22. Keller TS, Kosmopoulos V, Lieberman IH. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty affect vertebral motion segment stiffness and stress distributions: a microstructural finite-element study. SPINE. 2005;30(11):1258–1265
  23. Marom SA, Linden MJ. Computer aided stress analysis of long bones utilizing computed tomography. J. Biomech. 1990;23(5):399–404
  24. Goldstein SA. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. J. Biomech. 1987;20(11/12):1055–1061
  25. Whitlow C, Reedy M, Cotton J, Kaminsky S, Berry J, Morris P. Investigating sacroplasty: technical considerations and biomechanical properties of sacral polymethylmethacrylate infusions in cadaveric pelvic specimens. In: Radiological society of North America 90th annual meeting. Chicago. 2004;
  26. Taddei F, Pancanti A, Viceconti M. An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. Med. Eng. Phys. 2004;26(1):61–69
  27. An YH, Barfield WR, Knets I. Methods of evaluation for bone dimensions, densities, contents, morphology and structures. In:  An YH,  Draughn RA editor. Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2000;p. 103–118
  28. World Health Organization Study Group (1994). Assessment of Fracture Risk and its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, WHO Technical Report Series 843, Geneva.
  29. Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, Fogelman I. Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound?. Osteoporos. Int. 2004;15(5):367–374
  30. Martin RB. Determinants of the mechanical properties of bones. J. Biomech. 1991;24(Suppl. 1):79–88(Erratum in: J. Biomech., 1992, 25(10), 1251)
  31. Hodgskinson R, Currey JD. Young's modulus, density and material properties in cancellous bone over a large density range. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 1992;3(5):377–381
  32. Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1977;59-A(7):954–962
  33. Giddings VL, Kurtz SM, Jewett CW, Foulds JR, Edidin AA. A small punch test technique for characterizing the elastic modulus and fracture behavior of PMMA bone cement used in total joint replacement. Biomaterials. 2001;22(13):1875–1881
  34. Linden U. Mechanical properties of bone cement—importance of the mixing technique. Clin. Orth. Rel. Res. 1991;272:274–278
  35. Saha S, Pal S. Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1984;18:435–462
  36. Simonian PT, Routt ML, Harrington RM, Tencer AF. Internal fixation for the transforaminal sacral fracture. Clin. Orth. 1996;323:202–209
  37. Heini PF, Berlemann U, Kaufmann M, Lippuner K, Fankhauser C, van Landuyt P. Augmentation of mechanical properties in osteoporotic vertebral bones—a biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty efficacy with different bone cements. Eur. Spine J. 2001;10:164–171
  38. Zannoni C, Mantovani R, Viceconti M. Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. Med. Eng. Phys. 1998;20(10):735–740

PII: S1350-4533(06)00068-3

doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.03.008

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 29, Issue 3 , Pages 316-325 , April 2007