Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 9 , Pages 888-893 , November 2006

Axial cyclic behavior of the bone–screw interface

  • Serkan İnceoğlu

      Affiliations

    • Spine Research Laboratory, W31, The Cleveland Clinic Spine Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 216 445 2368; fax: +1 216 636 2749.
    • ,
  • Mike Ehlert

      Affiliations

    • Spine Research Laboratory, W31, The Cleveland Clinic Spine Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
    • ,
  • Atilla Akbay

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
    • ,
  • Robert F. McLain

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Spine Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

Received 4 November 2005 ,Revised 2 December 2005 ,Accepted 29 December 2005.

References 

  1. Ohlin A, Karlsson M, Duppe H, et al. Complications after transpedicular stabilization of the spine. A survivorship analysis of 163 cases. Spine. 1994;19:2774–2779
  2. Pihlajamaki H, Myllynen P, Bostman O. Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:183–189
  3. Inceoglu S, Ferrara L, McLain RF. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque. Spine J. 2004;4:513–518
  4. Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, et al. Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng. 1996;118:391–398
  5. Daftari TK, Horton WC, Hutton WC. Correlations between screw hole preparation, torque of insertion, and pullout strength for spinal screws. J Spinal Disord. 1994;7:139–145
  6. Hirano T, Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE, et al. Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability. Spine. 1997;22:2504–2509
  7. Pfeiffer M, Gilbertson LG, Goel VK, et al. Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws. Spine. 1996;21:1037–1044
  8. Lakes RS, Katz JL, Sternstein SS. Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone—I. Torsional and biaxial studies. J Biomech. 1979;12:657–678
  9. Caler WE, Carter DR. Bone creep-fatigue damage accumulation. J Biomech. 1989;22:625–635
  10. Deligianni DD, Maris A, Missirlis YF. Stress relaxation behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech. 1994;27:1469–1476
  11. Lakes RS, Katz JL. Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone—II. Relaxation mechanisms. J Biomech. 1979;12:679–687
  12. Pugh JW, Rose RM, Radin EL. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone: dependence on structure. J Biomech. 1973;6:475–485
  13. Berzins A, Shah B, Weinans H, et al. Nondestructive measurements of implant–bone interface shear modulus and effects of implant geometry in pull-out tests. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;34:337–340
  14. Dhert WJ, Verheyen CC, Braak LH, et al. A finite element analysis of the push-out test: influence of test conditions. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26:119–130
  15. Harrigan TP, Kareh J, Harris WH. The influence of support conditions in the loading fixture on failure mechanisms in the push-out test: a finite element study. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:678–684
  16. Shirazi-Adl A. Finite element stress analysis of a push-out test. Part 1: Fixed interface using stress compatible elements. J Biomech Eng. 1992;114:111–118
  17. Shirazi-Adl A, Dammak M, Zukor DJ. Fixation pull-out response measurement of bone screws and porous-surfaced posts. J Biomech. 1994;27:1249–1258
  18. Weinstein JN, Rydevik BL, Rauschning W. Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin Orthop. 1992;284:34–46
  19. Fyhrie DP, Schaffler MB. Failure mechanisms in human vertebral cancellous bone. Bone. 1994;15:105–109
  20. Linde F, Hvid I. Nondestructive mechanical testing of cancellous bone. In:  An YH,  Draughn RA editor. Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone–Implant Interface. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC; 2000;p. 151–157

PII: S1350-4533(06)00003-8

doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.12.009

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 9 , Pages 888-893 , November 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution