Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 8 , Pages 837-841, October 2006

The uncertainty of the pendulum method for the determination of the moment of inertia

  • James J. Dowling

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ont., Canada L8S 4K1
  • ,
  • Jennifer L. Durkin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada N2L 3G1
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 519 888 4567x7535; fax: +1 519 746 6776.
  • ,
  • David M. Andrews

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ont., Canada

Received 27 July 2005; received in revised form 17 November 2005; accepted 25 November 2005. published online 30 January 2006.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to quantify the uncertainty of the pendulum method for determining the moment of inertia of an object using various suspension distances. Experimental data were collected on a known geometric solid and partial differential equations were derived to calculate the uncertainty. Repeated measures were used to estimate the errors of the mass, period of oscillation, and distance measurements from the axis to the centre of mass. The results showed that the pendulum method was relatively insensitive to measurement errors of mass but was quite sensitive to errors in the period of oscillation. It was also found that the uncertainty of the pendulum method could be drastically reduced to less than 3% by suspending the object with the axis located at the radius of gyration. Most studies using the pendulum method to determine limb inertial properties have adopted a proximal suspension, including the often cited work by Dempster [Dempster WT. Space requirements for the seated operator. W ADC Technical Report 55–159. Ohio: Aero Medical Laboratory, Wright Air Development Centre, Air Research and Development Council, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base; 1955]. The results suggest that validation of imaging techniques to determine inertial properties should use geometric solids in addition to the pendulum method where the object is suspended at a distance estimated to be the radius of gyration. It is further recommended that the uncertainty be reported whenever it is necessary to use the pendulum method.

Keywords: Anthropometry, Pendulum method, Uncertainty, Biomechanics, Moment of inertia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1350-4533(05)00249-3

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.11.007

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 8 , Pages 837-841, October 2006