Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 7 , Pages 694-709, September 2006

Adaptive fuzzy k-NN classifier for EMG signal decomposition

  • Sarbast Rasheed

      Affiliations

    • Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Lab, Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada N2L 3G1
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 519 8884567; fax: +1 519 7464791.
  • ,
  • Daniel Stashuk

      Affiliations

    • Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Lab, Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada N2L 3G1
  • ,
  • Mohamed Kamel

      Affiliations

    • Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Lab, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada N2L 3G1

Received 26 July 2005; received in revised form 2 November 2005; accepted 9 November 2005. published online 09 January 2006.

Abstract 

An adaptive fuzzy k-nearest neighbour classifier (AFNNC) for EMG signal decomposition is presented and evaluated. The developed classifier uses an adaptive assertion-based classification approach for setting a minimum classification threshold. The similarity criterion used for grouping motor unit potentials (MUPs) is based on a combination of MUP shapes and two modes of use of motor unit firing pattern information: passive and active. The performance of the developed classifier was evaluated using synthetic signals with specific properties and experimental signals and compared with the performance of an adaptive template matching classifier, the adaptive certainty classifier (ACC). Across the sets of simulated and experimental EMG signals used for comparison, the AFNNC had better average classification performance overall, but due to the assignment of higher numbers of MUPs it made relatively more errors. Nonetheless, these increased error rates would still be acceptable for most clinical uses of decomposed EMG data. An independent and a related set of simulated signals were used for testing. For the independent simulated signals of varying intensity, the AFNNC had on average an improved correct classification rate (CCr) (8.1%) but an increased error rate (Er) (1.5%) compared to ACC. For the related simulated signals with varying amounts of shape and/or firing pattern variability, the AFNNC on average had an improved CCr (5%) but a slightly increased Er (0.3%) compared to ACC. For experimental signals, the AFNNC on average had improved CCr (6%) but an increased Er (2.1%) compared to ACC. The greatest gains in AFNNC performance relative to that of the ACC occurred when the variability of MUP shapes within motor unit potential trains was high suggesting that compared to a template matching assignment strategy the NN assignment paradigm is better able to ameliorate the classification problems caused by MUP instability.

Keywords: EMG signal decomposition, Motor unit firing patterns, Nearest neighbour classification, Fuzzy k-NN

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1350-4533(05)00243-2

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.11.001

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 7 , Pages 694-709, September 2006