Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 7 , Pages 629-638, September 2006

Physiological modelling of agitation–sedation dynamics including endogenous agitation reduction

  • A.D. Rudge

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Bioengineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +64 21 147 5582; fax: +64 3 364 2078.
  • ,
  • J.G. Chase

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Bioengineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • ,
  • G.M. Shaw

      Affiliations

    • Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, University of Otago School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • ,
  • D. Lee

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Bioengineering, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

Received 18 April 2005; received in revised form 7 October 2005; accepted 17 October 2005. published online 21 November 2005.

Abstract 

Sedation administration and agitation management are fundamental activities in any intensive care unit. A lack of objective measures of agitation and sedation, as well as poor understanding of the underlying dynamics, contribute to inefficient outcomes and expensive healthcare. Recent models of agitation–sedation pharmacodynamics have enhanced understanding of the underlying dynamics and enable development of advanced protocols for semi-automated sedation administration. However, these initial models do not capture all observed dynamics, particularly periods of low sedative infusion. A physiologically representative model that incorporates endogenous agitation reduction (EAR) dynamics is presented and validated using data from 37 critical care patients. High median relative average normalised density (RAND) values of 0.77 and 0.78 support and minimum RAND values of 0.51 and 0.55 for models without and with EAR dynamics respectively show that both models are valid representations of the fundamental agitation–sedation dynamics present in a broad spectrum of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. While the addition of the EAR dynamic increases the ability of the model to capture the observed dynamics of the agitation–sedation system, the improvement is relatively small and the sensitivity of the model to the EAR dynamic is low. Although this may represent a limitation of the model, the inclusion of EAR is shown to be important for accurately capturing periods of low, or no, sedative infusion, such as during weaning prior to extubation.

Keywords: Physiological models, Non-linear dynamics, Dynamic modelling, Agitation, Sedation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1350-4533(05)00221-3

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.008

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 7 , Pages 629-638, September 2006