Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 525-533 , July 2006

A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants

  • M.A. Pérez

      Affiliations

    • Group of Structural Mechanics and Material Modelling, Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, 50015 Zaragoza, Spain
  • ,
  • J.M. García-Aznar

      Affiliations

    • Group of Structural Mechanics and Material Modelling, Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, 50015 Zaragoza, Spain
  • ,
  • M. Doblaré

      Affiliations

    • Group of Structural Mechanics and Material Modelling, Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, 50015 Zaragoza, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +34 976 76 19 12; fax: +34 976 76 25 78.
  • ,
  • B. Seral

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology University Hospital of Zaragoza, Spain
  • ,
  • F. Seral

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology University Hospital of Zaragoza, Spain

Received 26 January 2005 ,Revised 26 July 2005 ,Accepted 28 September 2005.

References 

  1. Franklin J, Robertsson O, Gestsson J, Lohmander LS, Ingvarsson T. Revision and complication rates in 654 Exeter total hip replacements, with a maximum follow-up of 20 years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4(1):6
  2. Herberts P, Malchau H. How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;344:44–60
  3. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:111–121
  4. Huiskes R. Failed innovation in total hip replacement. Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64(6):699–716
  5. Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ, Collis DK, Johnston RC. Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77A:1315–1322
  6. Santore R. Can precoating of the femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty contribute to early loosening and failure?. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual meeting of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty. 1997;p. 8
  7. Bauer TW, Schils J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. Part I. Mechanisms of implant fixation. Skeletal Radiol. 1999;28(8):423–432
  8. Yuan X, Ryd L, Huiskes R. Wear particle diffusion and tissue differentiation in TKA implant fibrous interfaces. J Biomech. 2000;33(10):1279–1286
  9. Jasty M, Jiranek W, Harris WH. Acrylic fragmentation in total hip replacements and its biological consequences. Clin Orthop. 1992;285:116–128
  10. Shardlow DL, Stone MH, Ingham E, Fisher J. Cement particles containing radio-opacifiers stimulate pro-osteolytic cytokine production from a human monocytic cell line. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85(6):900–905
  11. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. The effects of cement–stem debonding in THA on the long-term failure probability of cement. J Biomech. 1997;30(8):795–802
  12. Colombi P. Fatigue analysis of cemented hip prosthesis: damage accumulation scenario and sensitivity analysis. Int J Fatigue. 2002;24(7):739–746
  13. Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Murphy BP, Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R. Finite element simulation of anisotropic damage accumulation and creep in acrylic bone cement. Eng Fract Mech. 2004;71:513–528
  14. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, Haire T, Harris WH. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73-B:551–558
  15. Harrigan TP, Harris WH. A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement–prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components. J Biomech. 1991;24(11):1047–1058
  16. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction. J Biomech. 1996;29(12):1569–1575
  17. Lennon AB, McCormack BAO , Prendergast PJ. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25:833–841
  18. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Wright TM, Ingraffea AR. Mechanical characteristics of the stem–cement interface. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:798–808
  19. Perez MA, Garcia JM, Doblare M. Analysis of the debonding of the stem–cement interface in total hip arthroplasty using a non-linear fracture mechanics approach. Eng Fract Mech. 2005;72(8):1125–1147
  20. Lennon AB, Prendergast PJ. Residual stress due to curing can initiate damage in porous bone cement: experimental and theoretical evidence. J Biomech. 2002;32:311–321
  21. Nuño N, Avanzolini G. Residual stresses at the stem–cement interface of an idealized cemented hip stem. J Biomech. 2002;35(6):849–852
  22. Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc. Abaqus user's Manual, v. 6.4. HKS Inc. RI, USA: Pawtucket; 2004.
  23. Miner MA. Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Appl Mech. 1945;1:159–164
  24. Chen PC, Pinto JG, Mead EH, D’Lima DD, Colwell CW. Fatigue model to characterize cement–metal interface in dynamic shear. Clin Orthop. 1998;350:229–236
  25. Lemaitre J. A course on damage mechanics. Springer-Verlag; 1987;
  26. Murphy BP, Prendergast PJ. The relationship between stress, porosity, and nonlinear damage accumulation in acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;59:646–654
  27. Chwirut DJ. Long-term compressive creep deformation and damage in acrylic bone cements. J Biomed Mater Res. 1984;18:25–37
  28. Huiskes R, Verdonschot N, Nivbrant B. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:103–112
  29. International Society of Biomechanics website. Website was accessed in http://www.isbweb.org, accessed in 2001.
  30. Norton MR, Yarlagadda R, Anderson GH. Catastrophic failure of the Elite Plus total hip replacement, with a Hylamer acetabulum and zirconia ceramic femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-B:631–635
  31. Garcia Araujo C, Fernandez Gonzalez J, Tonino A. Rheumatoid arthritis and hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses: five-year results. International ABG Working Group. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(6):660–667
  32. Structural Dynamics Research Corporation I-DEAS Master Series Release 9.0. Ohio: Milford; 2003.
  33. Davies JP, Burke DW, O’Connor DO, Harris WH. Comparison of the fatigue characteristic of centrifuged and uncentrifuged simplex P bone cement. J Orthop Res. 1987;5:366–371
  34. Doblaré M, García JM. Bone remodelling analysis of the proximal femur after total hip replacement and implantation of an exeter prosthesis. J Biomech. 2001;34(9):1157–1170
  35. Doblaré M, García JM. Anisotropic bone remodelling model based on a continuum damage-repair theory. J Biomech. 2002;35(1):1–17
  36. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34:859–871
  37. Heller MO, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Dürselen L, Pohl M, Claes L, et al. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech. 2001;34:883–893
  38. Morlock M, Schneider E, Bluhm A, Vollmer M, Bergmann G, Müller V, et al. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech. 2001;34:873–881
  39. Alfaro-Adrián J, Dill HS, Murray DW. Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(5):598–606
  40. Langlais F, Benkalfate T, Thomazeau H, Abboud A, Lancien G, Chauvel JJ. Femoral loosening of total hip prosthesis caused by pseudarthrosis resulting form trocahnterotomy. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1995;81(2):95–105
  41. Ling RS. Cemented arthroplasty: 20 years onward. Orthopedics. 1996;19(9):735
  42. Alfaro-Adrián J, Dill HS, Murray DW. Cement migration after THR: a comparison of Charnley Elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81-B:130–134
  43. Meek RM, Michos J, Grigoris P, Hamblen DL. Mid-term results and migration behaviour of a ti-alloy cemented stem. Int Orthop. 2002;26(6):356–360
  44. Baillon R, Batarilo Z, Hinsenkamp M, Rooze M. Validation of a new in vivo measurement method to measure subsidence of a cemented Exeter femoral stem. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2004;90(3):232–240
  45. Fornasier WL, Cameron HU. The femoral stem/cement interface in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;116:248–252
  46. Gardiner RC, Hozack WJ. Failure of the cement–bone interface. A consequence of strengthening the cement–prosthesis interface. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76-B:49–52
  47. Grasa J, Pérez MA, Bea JA, García-Aznar JM, Doblare M. A probabilistic damage model for acrylic cements. Application to the life prediction of cemented hip implants. Int J Fat. 2005;27:891–904

PII: S1350-4533(05)00209-2

doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.09.007

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 525-533 , July 2006