Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 5 , Pages 483-488, June 2006

Measuring contact area, force, and pressure for bioengineering applications: Using Fuji Film and TekScan systems

  • Kent N. Bachus

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University of Utah Orthopaedic Center, 590 Wakara Way, A0100, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Orthopaedic Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 801 587 5200; fax: +1 801 587 5211.
  • ,
  • Alyssa L. DeMarco

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University of Utah Orthopaedic Center, 590 Wakara Way, A0100, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
    • MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists Ltd., Richmond, BC, Canada
  • ,
  • Kyle T. Judd

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University of Utah Orthopaedic Center, 590 Wakara Way, A0100, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
  • ,
  • Daniel S. Horwitz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Orthopaedic Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
  • ,
  • Darrel S. Brodke

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Orthopaedic Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA

Received 10 September 2004; received in revised form 20 July 2005; accepted 26 July 2005. published online 23 September 2005.

Abstract 

The goal of this study was to compare the TekScan I-Scan™ Pressure Measurement System with two methods of analysis involving the Fuji Film Prescale Pressure Measuring System in estimating area, force and pressure. Fuji Film and TekScan sensors were alternately placed between a cylindrical peg and a finely ground steel base plate, and compressed with known forces. All Fuji stains were digitally scanned and analyzed. The Erase method of Fuji Film analysis consisted of manually removing portions of the image judged by the user to be outside the perimeter of the stain. The second method of Fuji Film analysis, termed the Threshold method, used the threshold tool to analyze only those pixels that were stained from loading. The TekScan system utilized special matrix-based sensors interfaced with a Windows™ compatible desktop computer that was equipped with specialized data acquisition hardware and analysis software.

The data from this study did not support the hypothesis that all three methods would have accuracies within ±5% of a known value, when estimating area, force and pressure. Specifically, the TekScan system was found to be more accurate than either of the Fuji Film methods when estimating area and pressure.

Keywords: Area, Force, Pressure, TekScan, Fuji Film

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1350-4533(05)00171-2

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.07.022

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 5 , Pages 483-488, June 2006