A numerical approach to evaluate the fatigue life of monolimb

References 

1. Lee WCC, Zhang M, Jia XH, Boone DA. A computational model for monolimb design. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Biomechanics. Dunedin, New Zealand. 2003;
2. Lee WCC , Zhang M, Jia XH, Boone DA, Bill C. Finite element analysis to determine the effect of monolimb flexibility on structural strength and interaction between residual limb and prosthetic socket. J Rehab Res Dev. 2004;6A:775–786
3. Valenti TJ. Experience with endoflex: a monolithic thermoplastic prosthesis for below-knee amputees. J Prosthet Orthot. 1991;3:43–50
4. Rothschild VR, Fox JR, Michael JW, Rothschild RJ, Playfair G. Clinical experience with total thermoplastic lower limb prostheses. J Prosthet Orthot. 1991;3:51–54
5. Reed B, Wilson AB, Pritham C. Evaluation of an ultralight below-knee prosthesis. Orthot Prosthet. 1979;33:45–53
6. Wilson A, Stills M. Ultra-light prostheses for below-knee amputees. Orthot Prosthet. 1976;30:43–47
7. Coleman KL, Boone DA, Smith DG, Czerniecki JM. Effect of trans-tibial prosthesis pylon flexibility on ground reaction forces during gait. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2001;25:195–201
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Schuch MC. Thermoplastic applications in lower extremity prosthetics. J Prosthet Orthot. 1991;3:1–8
9. Current TA, Kogler GF, Barth DG. Static structural testing of trans-tibial composite sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1999;23:113–122
   • MEDLINE
10. Neo LD, Lee PVS, Goh JCH. Principal structural testing of trans-tibial prosthetic assemblies: specimen preparation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000;24:241–245
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
11. Hahl J, Taya M. Experimental and numerical predictions of the ultimate strength of a low-cost composite transtibial prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:405–413
    • MEDLINE
12. Miner MA. Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Appl Mech. 1945;12:A159–A164
13. Tanaka S, Akita S. On the Miner's damage hypothesis in notched specimen with emphasis on scatter of fatigue life. Engng Fract Mech. 1975;7:473–480
14. Manson SS, Halford GR. Reexamination of cumulative fatigue damage analysis—an engineering perspective. Engng Fract Mech. 1986;25:539–571
15. Hashin Z. A reinterpretation of Palmgren–Miner rule for fatigue life prediction. J Appl Mech. 1980;47:324–328
16. Schott G, Donat B, Schaper M. The consecutive Wöhler curve approach to damage accumulation. Engng Fract Mech. 1996;19:373–385
17. Ni K. Advances in stochastic theory of fatigue damage accumulation. Adv Mech. 1999;29:43–65(in Chinese)
18. Lee WCC, Zhang M, Jia XH, Cheung JTM. Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket. Med Eng Phys. 2004;26:655–662
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (499 KB)
    • CrossRef
19. Mansour AE, Wirsching PH. Sensitivity factors and their application to marine structures. Mar Strut. 1995;8:229–255
20. Wirsching PH. Fatigue reliability for offshore structures. J Strut Engng. 1984;100:2340–2356
21. Kumar A, Karsan DI. Fatigue reliability of parallel systems. J Strut Engng. 1990;116:719–729
22. Maier C, Calafut T. In:  Woishnis W editors. Polypropylene—the definitive user's guide and databook. New York: Plastics Design Library, a division of William Andrew Inc.; 1998;
23. Melchers RE. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Chichester: John Wiley; 1999;