Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 134-148, March 2006

Genetic fuzzy modelling and control of bispectral index (BIS) for general intravenous anaesthesia

  • Jiann-Shing Shieh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, 135 Yuan-Tung Rd., Chung-Li, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +886 3 463 8800x2470; fax: +886 3 455 8013.
  • ,
  • Ming-Hsien Kao

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, 135 Yuan-Tung Rd., Chung-Li, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Chien-Chiang Liu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan

Received 13 September 2004; received in revised form 13 March 2005; accepted 13 April 2005. published online 16 June 2005.

Abstract 

Based on an adaptive genetic fuzzy clustering algorithm, a derived fuzzy knowledge model is proposed for quantitatively estimating the systolic arterial pressure (SAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index (BIS) using 12 patients and it validates them according to pharmacological reasoning. Also, a genetic proportional integral derivative controller (GPIDC) to adaptive three controller parameters and a genetic fuzzy logic controller (GFLC) to adaptive controller rules using genetic algorithms (GAs) were simulated and compared each other in a patient model using the BIS value as a controlled variable. Each controller was tested using a set of 12 virtual patients undergoing a Gaussian random surgical disturbance repeated with BIS targets set at 40, 50, and 60. Controller performance was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE) of the BIS target, the percentage of time with acceptable BIS control (PTABC), and drug consumption (DC). It was found that the MAE value of the BIS target was significantly lower (P<0.05) and the values of PTABC and DC of BIS target were significantly higher (P<0.05) in BIS targets set at 40 than at 50 or 60 in both GPIDC and GFLC. However, when compared with two controllers in terms of the values of MAE, PTABC, and DC each other in BIS targets set at 40, 50, and 60, there were no significant differences (P>0.05). Furthermore, when the simulation results in these two controllers were compared with routine standard practice of 12 clinical trials (i.e., manual control) in BIS target set at 50, the values of PTABC in both GPIDC and GFLC groups were significantly higher (P<0.05) than in the manual control group. In contrast, there were no significant differences (P>0.05) for these three groups in terms of drug consumption. This indicates that either GPIDC or GFLC can control the BIS target set at 50 better than manual control, although the similar drug consumption is used.

Keywords: Adaptive genetic fuzzy clustering, Bispectral index, Genetic proportional integral derivative controller, Genetic fuzzy logic controller, Mean absolute error, Percentage of time with acceptable BIS control, Drug consumption

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was carried out at National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan. Financially supported by the National Science Council (NSC) in Taiwan, Grant Number: NSC92-2320-B-002-111.

PII: S1350-4533(05)00098-6

doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.04.023

Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 134-148, March 2006